Unofficial File parts/66237.dat
Part Attributes:
File Header:
0 Bar with Drafting Machine
0 Name: 66237.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 !HELP The arm moves ~ +/-15 degree
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !KEYWORDS 3D Print, Inside Tour 2019, Set 4000034
0 !HISTORY 2026-02-04 [MagFors] Created sub parts
Show contents
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\66237s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\66237s02.dat
Status:
Errors Found (HN)
This part has the following automated holds from the Parts Tracker
-
Has Uncertified Subfiles
Current Votes:
| User | Vote |
|---|---|
| Holly-Wood | Hold |
Official parents and subparts
Part Events:
Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
initially submitted the part.
2019-06-14 22:30:01
Steffen [Steffen]
posted a vote of Hold
2019-06-14 22:45:01
- 2 circular edgelines missing where the bar meets the cylinder
- at the bottom, edgelines of the box are continuing onto the bottom circular surface unnecessarily
- at the bottom, edgelines of the box are continuing onto the bottom circular surface unnecessarily
Max Martin Richter [MMR1988]
posted a vote of Hold
2021-09-29 20:00:01
This is not just a static part. It's possible to turn it around.
Here is a link to this:
https://www.newelementary.com/2019/06/lego-inside-tour-set-4000034-3d-part.html
Here is a link to this:
https://www.newelementary.com/2019/06/lego-inside-tour-set-4000034-3d-part.html
Eugen [app4soft]
made the following comment.
2024-10-09 23:31:00
I suppose actual part should be the static base as 66237.dat, and its movable should be moved to separate subset part.
Also, maybe, 66237.dat should be a shortcut for two subparts?
Also, maybe, 66237.dat should be a shortcut for two subparts?
Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
made the following comment.
2025-03-28 11:42:34
http://www.digital-bricks.de/en/index.php?site=3d&part=60417
http://www.digital-bricks.de/en/file.php?part=60410
has a "split" model (still one part, but the cut is visible), also includes the "spring"
looks like some parts could get reused from there
(why another part number? 66237 vs 60417)
as far as I can see it is really one part, but with a flexible printed "spring"
-> could still get split into the two static parts plus spring subparts
http://www.digital-bricks.de/en/file.php?part=60410
has a "split" model (still one part, but the cut is visible), also includes the "spring"
looks like some parts could get reused from there
(why another part number? 66237 vs 60417)
as far as I can see it is really one part, but with a flexible printed "spring"
-> could still get split into the two static parts plus spring subparts
Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
made the following comment.
2025-03-28 11:44:51
sorry, wrong part link: http://www.digital-bricks.de/en/file.php?part=60417
Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2026-02-04 19:18:28
How should we handle the different sub-parts of the 3D printed parts?
Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
made the following comment.
2026-02-04 19:33:45
did you use the ldd data or did you rework the old one? misses the spring inside...
(the original LDD data shows the connection, it is one part with two main parts, connected by a ~-shaped solid spring)
(the original LDD data shows the connection, it is one part with two main parts, connected by a ~-shaped solid spring)
Javier Orquera [kuramapika1]
made the following comment.
2026-02-04 20:09:01
Hello: here is what I did, https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-28806.html?highlight=66237.
Hope it help.
Hope it help.
Chris Böhnke [KnightOfTarenta]
made the following comment.
2026-02-04 20:18:49
@Magnus:
Are there cases where separate -f01/-f02 versions would be needed? I guess this one doesn't need to because the extreme positions aren't stable...
Personally I'd prefer the current approach with -s01/s02 etc. since neither component is a separate piece of plastic, but Im not sure if this will cause issues with moving parts.
@Rene:
I doubt this is from LDD. LDD stopped updating it's parts library in late 2017, this is from 2019. I also cant find it in the latest version.
Are there cases where separate -f01/-f02 versions would be needed? I guess this one doesn't need to because the extreme positions aren't stable...
Personally I'd prefer the current approach with -s01/s02 etc. since neither component is a separate piece of plastic, but Im not sure if this will cause issues with moving parts.
@Rene:
I doubt this is from LDD. LDD stopped updating it's parts library in late 2017, this is from 2019. I also cant find it in the latest version.
Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
made the following comment.
2026-02-04 21:20:08
the part was at digital-bricks (link is above, unfortunately its dead now), which has mostly LDD data
Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
made the following comment.
2026-02-04 22:02:19
All I did was to split and clean up the file made by Gerald, and added some details seen in the video at NE. Eyeballing it.
But thanks. Didn't know the missing mesh was in the forum.
But thanks. Didn't know the missing mesh was in the forum.
Willy Tschager [Holly-Wood]
posted a vote of Hold
2026-04-13 13:32:30
The raw file is back at Digital Bricks and it looks different from this one - especially the bar at the bottom. Looks actually like the original part:
https://www.newelementary.com/2019/06/lego-inside-tour-set-4000034-3d-part.html
https://www.newelementary.com/2019/06/lego-inside-tour-set-4000034-3d-part.html
Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
made the following comment.
2026-04-13 15:34:08
Yes, this needs another overhaul. Wanna do it?
Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
made the following comment.
2026-04-13 15:37:41
in which subfile should the printed spring be? or separate subfile? (in different flex states?)
Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
made the following comment.
2026-04-13 15:44:36
I will do it finally...
Creative Commons Attribution License information
This part is copyright ©
Gerald Lasser
Licensed under
CC BY 4.0
Edits:
LDraw.org Parts Tracker,
Magnus Forsberg
It contains a special part that is supposedly 3D printed. I got pictures from a fellow member of our LUG with the part still in the bag.
Details are missing at the wide top clamp, there are some pockets visible. Probably need to ask for more pictures.